is playing on Knicks in 60 on MSG. Fish has hair. Robert Horry is still playing. And Sprewell was beastly. Shaq did not play that game so the Knicks W was tainted, Kobe attempted 41 shots against the Spurs the game before was 19-41 and in this game against NY he dropped 40 to Houston's 53 some great moves all game long. And lol @ Howard Eisley and Samaki Walker who started in place of Shaq.

...yay?

You ought to be happy, Tony; Nate Robinson is playing very well tonight for Boston.

Lol...yeah, he won't be happy, but I don't think you can dispute Nate played well...he's a tremendous asshole and thinks he's great when he's a role player at best, but he's done all you could ask of him tonight if your a Celtics fan...except for a dumb technical.

good night for him tonight did not watch the game but based on the stat sheet it seemed he's played well. I haven't seen the game so I don't know the whole story of his performance and that would have been a better indication to just his stats. But, if you say so that he played well then it's worth a look on Sportscenter or something. Congrats Nate...I still don't think he's anything special but a decent player.

If your like 4th or 5th player on a Knicks team where half it's players like him did not give a shit you may have some talent but your a role player. Nate is nothing more than that he isn't even top 50 best in what he does best his offense in the league nor top 20 best offensive SG. So it's ptretty safe to say he's a role player. But good game from him he's a sparkplug but nothing more really. Mike Dunleavy Jr. when healthy is a 19 PPG/5 RPG guy consistently and he's not an "All-Star" or anything that's not a role-player and he's better than Nate so what's that say. He's not a PG he's an undersized SG but that's what he plays SG.

Mike Dunleavy sucks :/

even with those stats he has absolutely no impact on most games

and nate was not your 4th or 5th best player. he led u guys in scoring when he played...

Tony,what's the point?

[quote="Dub C"]Mike Dunleavy sucks :/

even with those stats he has absolutely no impact on most games

and nate was not your 4th or 5th best player. he led u guys in scoring when he played...[/quote/}

Mike Dunleavy would beat Nate Robinson any day of the week. And no Nate Robinson did not lead us in scoring Al Harrington did. David Lee did this year and Harrington was 2nd. And don't give me Harrington played more minutes bull cause Harrington's minutes have been severely cut @ 6 man. Wilson Chandler and Danilo Gallinari are better than Nate as well if you say Nate is better than them that's just crazy they don't go up and gunning like Nate and can have a better impact offensively and are better offensive and overall players. Anyone of these guys can beat Nate handily. That would make him 5th best in NY when he was here. Hell Bill Walker looks like he'd be better than Nate. There's nothing special about him you hype him up to be something that he isn't he can be a decent player at best he's a more talented Gerald Green nothing more.

Nate Robinson is shooting 39% this postseason.

GTFO.

Stupid point^^^. He didnt play earlier in the postseason. He's getting minutes now in the finals and shooting 47
% from the field,44 from 3. earlier n the post season he would come in for 3-4 minutes put up 2 shots and miss em both and his FG% goes down..I say dont pay attention to FG% unless someone takes a decent amount of shots.

nate sonly 26..this guys gonna be legit.